Tehran is prepared to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington provided that it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.
Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations worked, and shared recent overtures had been made by go-betweens to reopen talks with the US government. He claimed Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to access attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.
Araghchi is navigating a difficult course since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more powerful militarily and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.
He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.
The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile termination on 12 June when Israel, with US support, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that culminated with the US president asserting the facilities had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states employed their right to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.
Iranian officials said they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with US participation could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.
It had not been decided in the talks that American atomic experts could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".
Iran's diplomats declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be resurrected in some form if discussions reopen.
The American leader in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a show.
In his speech to the gathering, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the concept of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be ended by combat operations. He said the attacks began with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and culminated with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.
Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making trust challenging to rebuild.
The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had fled negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had consistently sought to dictate their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be active and remains the final answer to resolve conflicts, but its requirements, regulations and tenets must be respected."
"In case they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and honor, they will get a reply in the same tone."
In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."
He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to destroy, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is important is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but failed to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed stronger, more integrated, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the wake of this invasion."
A data scientist and business strategist with over a decade of experience in transforming raw data into actionable insights for global enterprises.